Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Durham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1996No. COA95-276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant and third-party plaintiff City of Durham (the City) appeals a consent judgment designating as a “final judgment” the trial court’s previous entry of summary judgment in favor of third-party defendant Euroclassics, Ltd. (Euroclassics). The City contends summary judgment was improper. We disagree.

Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows: plaintiff Barbara J. Williams instituted the instant action 3 April 1992 against the City in consequence of injuries sustained in falling upon “a sunken, depressed area” of a public sidewalk in Durham. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Repinski v. Jubilee Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Dunning Ex Rel. Sowers v. Forsyth Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Votsis v. Ward's Coffee Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Walden v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Simkins v. Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. Department of Public WorksSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Mosteller v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API