Legal Opinion
United States v. Two Bags, Each Containing 110 Pounds, Poppy Seeds
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1945No. 9852PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The District Court dismissed a complaint filed as a libel in rem on information by the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio for the seizure and condemnation of two bags, more or less, each containing 110 pounds of poppy seeds, shipped in interstate commerce from Brooklyn, New York, to Cleveland, Ohio; and ordered the seized goods returned to the owner. The libel was grounded upon averments that the poppy seeds were adulterated within the meaning of Section 402(b) (3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 342(b) (3), which…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- The Upjohn Company v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, and Herbert L. Ley, Jr., Commissioner of Food and DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Lane Labs-Usa Inc, a Corporation Andrew J. Lane, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Article . Consisting of 216Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Woodside v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.