Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Woodside v. Sun Ray Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1955No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Ci-iidsey,

This is an appeal from the order of the Dauphin County Court which enjoined both defendants from selling a “frozen sweetened milk product referred to in these proceedings as Malt-A-Plenty and Shake-O-Malt”.

The action in equity was brought by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the Association of Ice Cream Manufacturers of Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, Inc. as intervening plaintiff, against the Sun Ray Drug Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, and Carlo Galletta and Richard Nasuti, individually and trading under the fictitious name of Carl-Rich, to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Best v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. PastorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Ace Tire Co., Inc. v. Municipal Officers of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API