Legal Opinion
United States v. Lane Labs-Usa Inc, a Corporation Andrew J. Lane, an Individual
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 2005No. 04-3592PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we are called upon to decide whether a district court has the power under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § §§ 301, et. seq. (“FDCA”), to order a defendant found to be in violation of the Act to pay restitution to consumers. Because a district court’s equitable powers in such a situation are broad, we hold that an order of restitution is properly within the jurisdiction of the court.
I
On August 11, 1994, Appellant Andrew Lane formed Lane Labs (“Labs”) to manufacture and supply health products. Andrew Lane is the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Federal Trade Commission v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- American Atheists, Inc. v. City of Detroit Downtown Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RX Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Joan Laskowski and Daniel M. Cook v. Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education, and University of Notre Dame, Intervenor-Defendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.