Owens v. State

On the trial in this oa'se defendant filed motion to quash the indictment on the ground of insufficiency of evidence before the grand jury returning the bill. The court heard evidence on the mo: tion, and entered a judgment denying same. In this there was no error. If there,had been no evidence before the grand jury, the motion should have been sustained, but, there having been some legal evidence, its sufficiency was for the grand jury. Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 555, 86 South. 257.

The date of the alleged seduction was fixed as of date the fourth Saturday night in April, after the promise…