Legal Opinion

Beason v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1902No. 2400PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Clay. Tried below before Hon. A. H. Carrigan. Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Ho statement is required to further illustrate the questions so fore-fully presented and discussed in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant, Lee Season, was charged by indictment with burglarizing a house occupied and controlled by Paul Schucht with the intent to commit the crime of theft, and that he did fraudulently take fifteen bushels of corn of the value of $6. His trial resulted in his conviction, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

This is the second appeal (Beason v. State, 2 Texas Court Reporter, 921), and is a companion case to Murmutt v. State, now pending, involving substantially the same issues. The record contains eight bills of. exception.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Doans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Davis v. BargasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Furlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Shippy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1921

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API