Legal Opinion

Haithcock v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1930No. 8 Div. 932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The indictment ended, “against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.” It is not necessary that each count should so end. The demurrer to. the indictment was properly overruled. McGuire v. State, 37 Ala. 161; Harrison v. State, 144 Ala. 20, 40 So. 568. On this particular, point the opinion in Hill v. State, 22 Ala. App. 422, 116 So. 411, is misleading and should not be followed. In the Hill Case, the words, “against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama,” were a part of the second count of the indictment, and, as there written, did not appear as a part of or. related to the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dennison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Way v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. ClarksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Anderson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API