Legal Opinion

Dohrn v. Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 25, 2008No. 06-0031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

David Dohrn lost forty acres to a tax sale for failure to pay his real estate taxes. In an action to void the tax deed, he claims the notice of redemption period has not expired because his tenants were not served with notice of redemption. We find the tenants should have been given notice of their right to redemption. Consequently, the tax deed is void and the redemption period remains open. Iowa Code section 448.16 does not bar an action challenging a void tax deed. The district court erred by finding Dohrn’s action untimely.

I. Facts and Prior Proceedings.

David Dohrn filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Jamison v. KnosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Ellsworth v. Low, Adams & FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Modern Heat & Power Co. v. Bishop Steamotor Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Smith v. HuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Red Flower, Inc. v. McKownColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Adair Holdings, L.L.c, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company v. Matthew Thomas Trucking, L.L.C., and George ThomasCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  3. Gary Kluender, Jr. v. Plum Grove Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API