Legal Opinion

Petty v. Chamberlain

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1950No. 1 Div. 377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice,

The bill in this case was filed by appellee against appellants to rescind and cancel a conveyance made by her upon the promise of support from appellants. Code 1940, Title 20, § 15.

The appellants, who were the grantees in the deed, answered by cross bill, and averred a bona fide execution of their agreement by virtue of which they had expended sums of money for the care and support of appellee, including doctors’ bills, and that they had also expended certain sums of money on the property for permanent improvements. The cross bill prayed for a reference to the register to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Box v. BoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Cornelius v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Freeman v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hipp v. McMurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Wilfe v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Maples v. CorderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Holly Wren Wallace Schumpert v. Alton Hugh Wallace, as the personal representative of the Estate of Alton Hamric Wallace, deceased; and Patsy Lockett Wallace, individually and as trustee of the Patsy Gayle Lockett Wallace and Alton Hamric Wallace Revocable TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026
  5. Petty v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API