Legal Opinion

Walter C. Hadley Co. v. Cummings

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1901No. Civil No. 733PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR from a judgment ol the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. F. M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStreet, C. J.

The defendants in error herein brought suit in the district court in and for Pinal County against the plaintiffs in error and one Charles P. Kuhnen, alleging that all the defendants were the owners of and in the possession of the mine, mining claim, mill, and pumping plant known as the “Mammon Mine and Mill,” and that John N. Isgrig, one of the defendants, was the superintendent of said property, in full charge thereof. The Walter C. Hadley Company at all times were the owners of the Mammon mine and mill, and while such owners entered into an agreement with Charles P. Kuhnen as follows, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eaman v. Bashford & BurmisterArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gates v. FredericksArizona Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harper v. Independence Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Demund Lumber Co. v. FrankeArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Foltz v. NoonArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Griffin v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ernst v. DeisterArizona Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API