Eaman v. Bashford & Burmister
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. Edmund W. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
These two ceses were tried and decided below upon the same state of facts,—the facts being stipulated by the parties,—and they came here upon the same grounds. We therefore write the opinion in the first case only, viz., Eaman v. Bashford & Burmister.
This suit was brought to enforce a lien for supplies and material furnished and used in repairing and operating the Tuscumbia Quartz Mill. One S. <0. Mott went into possession of the mill and the Black Warrior, Tuscumbia, and Tuscora mining claims under a written instrument from appellant, which, though in form a lease, was evidently intended to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Moore v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Walter C. Hadley Co. v. CummingsArizona Supreme Court · 1901
- Foltz v. NoonArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Gates v. FredericksArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Griffin v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.