Legal Opinion
Strahan v. Diodati
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 16, 2010No. Civil Action 05-10140-NMGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
This case involves the alleged inaction by state agencies (of which the defendants are representatives) when confronted with the entanglement of whales in fishing gear. Plaintiffs motions to dismiss and for partial summary judgment, as well as Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, are pending before the Court.
I. Background
Pro se plaintiff Richard Max Strahan (“Strahan”) is a self-proclaimed “citizen prosecutor” who has filed numerous lawsuits on behalf of whales that become entangled in fishing gear pursuant to the “citizen suit” provision of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strahan v. RougheadDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Barnes-De-Latexera v. San Jorge Children's HospitalDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Baez v. DugganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- MAN AGAINST XTINCTION, as Citizen Attorney General v. Cosco Container Lines America, IncDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Ogidi-Gbegbaje v. MagarianDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.