Legal Opinion

Alpine Importers of Calif. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 12, 1965No. C.D. 2555PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

In this action, the plaintiff contests the classification of certain imported merchandise under paragraph 1518(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Japanese Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem as artificial flowers, grasses, leaves, or stems, composed of materials other than yarns, threads, filaments, tinsel wire, lame, etc. It is contended that the merchandise is properly classifiable under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Moore International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Alpine Importers of Calif v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Wayne Withrow & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API