Legal Opinion

Moore v. Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority, The

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00154Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ALICIA MOORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-00154-SEH-SH ) THE METROPOLITAN TULSA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify attorney Steven Hickman and his firm from representing an opposing party. The Court finds that Hickman and his firm never formed an attorney-client relationship with Plaintiff, but that she did consult with them as a prospective client. However, the Court finds the information Plaintiff provided was generally known…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Green v. Montgomery County, Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS, INC. v. Manpower, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2008
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. DowdyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API