Legal Opinion

Magnuson v. Diekmann

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 2004No. A04-752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge. *

The district court granted summary judgment to respondents, the surviving children of a deceased father, reforming the deed by which the deceased father had left his residential property so that the children inherited as joint tenants rather than as tenants in common. Appellant, the estate of a son who predeceased the father, opposes that summary judgment. Because no genuine issue of material fact and no error of law precludes the judgment, we affirm.

FACTS

In 1991, Vernon Magnuson filed a quitclaim deed (the 1991 deed) preserving for himself a life interest in his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Yliniemi v. MausolfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Irvine v. OaasMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Eastling v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re Lyons Marital TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. David Eastling v. BP Products North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API