Legal Opinion

Eastling v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2009No. 08-3661PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

David Eastling and EFP, LLC (collectively, “Eastling”), entered into a real estate contract with BP Products North America (“BP”) to purchase from BP the property on which Eastling had been operating a gas station. The real estate contract included a restrictive covenant preventing the sale of any non-BP petroleum products on the property. Eastling filed suit, seeking a declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenant was no longer valid and enforceable. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to BP, and Eastling…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eckert v. Titan Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Telex Corporation v. Data Products CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Larson v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Naftalin v. John Wood CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Durham D & M, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. BP Products North America, Inc. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Mahony v. UNIVERSAL PEDIATRIC SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
  4. Bevill v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  5. BP Products North America, Inc. v. Charles Stanley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API