Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Blazic

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1994No. Nos. CA94-03-078, CA94-04-095PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-appellants and cross-appellees, John P. Blazic, D.D.S., and John P. Blazic, D.D.S., Inc., appeal an order of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas denying their motion for a new trial.

On April 17, 1991, plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant Bonnie C. Weidner consulted Dr. Blazic, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, to explore the possibility of dental' implants in hopes of relieving the pain Weidner had been suffering for temporomandibular joint (“TMJ”) syndrome. At the time of the consultation, Weidner was edentulous, having lost all her teeth to infection…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Williams v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Furr v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Sivit v. Village Green of Beachwood, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Decapua v. Rychlik, 91189 (4-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Shadle v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API