Legal Opinion

Decapua v. Rychlik, 91189 (4-30-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2009No. 91189UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Mary DeCapua, appeals the trial court's decision denying her motion for a new trial. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Defendant-appellee, Alexander Rychlik, rear-ended DeCapua in a motor vehicle accident. DeCapua subsequently brought a negligence action against Rychlik, seeking to recover the costs she incurred in medical expenses as well as pain and suffering. The parties stipulated to liability but disputed the extent of damages. The case proceeded to a jury trial where the following evidence was presented.

{¶ 3} DeCapua…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Favors v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Banas v. ShivelyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Hippely v. Lincoln Elec. Holdings, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Link v. FirstEnergy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Constant v. TorresOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API