Legal Opinion

People v. Koonce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2002No. Docket 117527PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver less than 50 grains of cocaine. On appeal, defendant argued, among other things, that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss, or, alternatively, that the trial court erred by failing to give a “missing witness” instruction on the basis of the prosecution’s failure to produce a witness. The Court of Appeals rejected that argument and affirmed on authority of People v O’Quinn, 185 Mich App 40; 460 NW2d 264 (1990), holding that, while the prosecution is obligated to provide a defendant with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hurd v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. RaiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. Bonilla-MachadoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. MorenoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API