Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. McDermott
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 16, 2003No. 1:03-cv-00099PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This case is before me on the National Labor Relations Board’s (Board) application for an order requiring respondent Laura McDermott to obey subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum issued by the Board in September 2002. For the reasons that follow, the application will be granted.
Background
The Board seeks information from McDermott regarding her husband, Robert Gordon, including his whereabouts and the location of any assets attributable to him.
On April 10, 2000, the Tenth Circuit entered a supplemental judgment enforcing an order of the Board finding Gordon,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gary Frazier, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Evans Plumbing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alpine Amusement Company, Inc. v. 741, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Paulson v. McKowenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020