Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Gary Frazier, an Individual
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 15, 1992No. 91-5475PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns an enforcement proceeding brought by the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) to compel Gary Frazier to testify in an unfair labor practice proceeding. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey referred the matter to a United States Magistrate Judge who denied the Board’s application for enforcement of its subpoena ad testificandum. The district judge, applying the “clearly erroneous” standard, affirmed the magistrate judge’s decision. On appeal, the Board argues that the district court should have reviewed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. Mack Trucks, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In Re Martha S. Griego, Debtor. Martha S. Griego v. Raymond E. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BDO USA, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In Re U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.