Legal Opinion

Cerf v. Pfleging

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1892No. 14492PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

Appeal from judgment and order denying a new trial.

This action was brought against the city of San Luis Obispo and its street superintendent to enjoin the opening of a street therein.

The city of San Luis Obispo, formerly the town of that name, was located upon public lands of the United States, and acquired title under an act of Congress entitled “ An act for the relief of the inhabitants of cities and towns,” passed March 2, 1867.

March 23, 1868, the legislature passed an act defining the limits of the town, and authorizing her board of trustees to enter these lands “in trust for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Burk v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Hall v. North Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. Rio Nido Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API