Legal Opinion

Bingham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1992No. 05-91-01082-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MALONEY, Justice.

A jury convicted Anthony Dwayne Bing-ham of arson and assessed a fifteen year sentence and a $1000 fine. Appellant claims the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for new trial on jury misconduct; (2) failing to submit jury instructions on accomplice witness testimony; and (3) admitting hearsay statements. Appellant also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

We sustain appellant’s second point of error on the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on accomplice witness testimony. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this cause for a new trial.

S…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API