Legal Opinion
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Weimar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1938No. 8664PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff, Weimar, against the defendant insurance company in an action to enforce liability under a policy of liability indemnity insurance.
The complaint alleged the execution and delivery by the company to one Axton Jones of a policy insuring Jones against liability up to $5,000 incurred by him by reason of the operation of an automobile specified in the policy; that, pursuant to the statutory requirement of the state of California, the policy undertook to reimburse, to the extent of the policy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Panhans v. Associated Indemnity Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Norton v. Central Surety & Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Carpenter v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. KovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.