Legal Opinion
McLaurin v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 27, 2000No. 1:98-cv-02058PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSS, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case sought review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for benefits. She now moves for fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), including charges associated with a motion for summary judgment that she filed after the Commissioner, admitting that the agency erred, moved to remand the case. By opinion and order dated May 3, 1999, I granted the Commissioner’s remand motion and denied plaintiffs cross-motion. Because I find, based on the record in this case,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barbour v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- McKay v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Uphill v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Harris v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Antonetti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.