Legal Opinion

Harris v. Astrue

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 31, 2010No. Civil Action 08-3356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

HURLEY, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff, Harold Harris, (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) which denied his claim for disability benefits. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs motions for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

Background

Plaintiff applied for Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. William J. Kerin, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. McLaurin v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barbour v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Pereira v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API