Legal Opinion

Schall v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the stipulated facts, and the undisputed oral and documentary evidence, we are of the opinion that the goods admittedly belonging to the plaintiffs would not have been released from the control of the Collector of Customs and delivered into the hands of one admittedly not entitled thereto were it not for the agreement legally entered into between the defendant Newton and the defendant guaranty company to effect such release and delivery upon the giving of the bond, and that such bond was given pursuant to legal authority vested in the Collector for the precise and specific purpose of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyett v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conklin v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Giles v. NewtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  3. Lafontan v. EltingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Conklin v. NewtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API