Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Newton

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1928No. 2672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover from the collector as an individual the sum of $32,807.22, the invoice value of certain pimentos, with interest thereon from March 26, 1919.

On February 1,1919, the firm of Roman y Masearell, of Gandia, Spain, shipped on the steamship Armuru 10,950 eases of preserved peppers to their own order at New York, receiving from the steamsMp a bill of lading signed by the master of the ship showing sMpment to the order of the shippers, Roman y Masearell., Roman, of the firm of Roman y Masearell, indorsed the bill of lading “to the order of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Schall v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Derobert v. StranahanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
  4. Schall v. NewtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lafontan v. EltingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API