Legal Opinion

Agrico Chemical Company and Continental Insurance Company v. S/s Atlantic Forest, Eurogulf Lines, Inc., D/B/A Central Gulf Contramar Line

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1980No. 79-1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals the district court judgment holding it liable for losses to the plaintiff due to short and damaged cargo. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

The defendant Central Gulf had contracted to carry a load of urea from Rotterdam, Holland to New Orleans, Louisiana for the plaintiff, Agrico Chemical Company. The parties agreed upon an optional mode bill of lading, which permitted the carrier to elect between carriage by the LASH (Lighter Aboard Ship) system of transportation and carriage on general ships. Central Gulf opted for the LASH system and loaded the urea aboard…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Agrico Chemical Co. v. SS Atlantic ForestDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V RisanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Hale Container Line, Inc. v. Houston Sea Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Cross-Appellants v. M/v "Leslie Lykes", Etc., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  5. Asahi America, Inc. v. the M/V Arild MaerskDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API