Legal Opinion · Dissent
Triple Crown at Observatory Village Ass'n v. Village Homes of Colorado, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA1390Published
1Dissent
JUDGE TERRY
dissenting.
¶ 35 Because I believe that the granting of this petition for interlocutory review under C.A.R. 4.2 is incompatible with Colorado statutory and case law, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision.
¶36 Acceptance of this petition contravenes the Uniform Arbitration Act, sections 13-22-201 to -230, C.R.S.2013, which allows an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration, see § 13-22-228(l)(a), C.R.S.2013, while not allowing an appeal from an order compelling arbitration, such as the order here, see generally § 13-22-228.
¶37 In J.P.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Lunsford v. Western States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Long v. DeGeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mountain Plains Constructors, Inc. v. TorrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- J.P. Meyer Trucking & Construction, Inc. v. Colorado School Districts Self Insurance PoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.