Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. Western States Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 1995No. 93SC764PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

This case concerns the scope of protection provided by Colorado’s “slayer statute” to insurance companies that paid life insurance policy proceeds to a primary beneficiary who *81was later determined to have murdered the insured, where the insurers did not receive written notice of competing claims from the contingent beneficiaries prior to disbursement. See § 15-11-803, 6B C.R.S. (1987) (“slayer statute”). The plaintiff contingent beneficiaries obtained a judgment for damages against the defendant insurers based on a jury determination that the insurers acted negligently in paying the policy…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Johnny Overstreet, Administrator of the Estate of David Wilkey, Deceased v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Community Hospital v. FailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Bayer v. Crested Butte Mountain Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API