Legal Opinion

Occidental Consolidated Min. Co. v. Comstock Tunnel Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided September 8, 1903No. 708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

At Law. On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(orally). It was claimed by defendant upon the motion for new trial that the court erred in instructing the jury as to the measure of damages which the plaintiff was entitled to recover, if the jury should find in its favor. I am of opinion that the instructions given upon this point were as favorable to the defendant as the law would warrant. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court as to the measure of damages. It is true that in one portion of the charge the word “deduct” was inappropriately used, but it is manifest that, notwithstanding this inadvertence, or improper use of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burrell v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glazer v. GlazerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  2. Calkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Scheurer v. Banner Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Lawlor v. LoeweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API