Legal Opinion
United States v. MacInnes
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 30, 2014No. Criminal Action No. 12-623PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.
In November 2013, following a jury trial, Defendants Robroy Maclnnes and Robert Keszey were convicted of participating in a conspiracy to traffic in illegally obtained animals; Maclnnes was also convicted of trafficking in illegally obtained animals in violation of the Lacey Act. Both Defendants have filed motions for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, raising a variety of evidentiary and legal errors that allegedly deprived them of a fair trial.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Defendants are not entitled to a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. EpsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Nicholas Ashley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025