Legal Opinion

United States v. Epstein

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 19, 2015No. Cr. No. 14-287 (FLW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge:

Defendants Rabbi Mendel Epstein, Rabbi Jay Goldstein, David Epstein and Rabbi Binyamin Stimler (collectively, “Defendants”), have been charged with multiple kidnapping-related crimes allegedly involving coercive gets obtained from Jewish husbands in Orthodox Jewish divorce proceedings. Before and during trial, the Court has decided numerous evidentiary issues raised by Defendants. While those rulings have been placed on the record, the Court expands upon, in this written Opinion, issues concerning Defendants’ religious-based defenses and arguments. Specifically,…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Binyamin StimlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Binyamin StimlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Binyamin StimlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API