Burke v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are raised on this appeal:
1. Is there credible evidence to support the jury’s determination that Hamann was causally negligent?
2. Did the trial court err in refusing to give certain requested instructions ?
3. Are the damages excessive ?
Negligence of Hamann.
As to the first question of Hamann’s causal negligence the standard of review invoked by this court is familiarly stated:
“The rule is well established that a verdict or a finding of a jury will not be set aside or disturbed, ‘if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Bleyer v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Lee v. National League Baseball Club of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Bash v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Burant v. OrtloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971