Legal Opinion

Burke v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Three issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Is there credible evidence to support the jury’s determination that Hamann was causally negligent?

2. Did the trial court err in refusing to give certain requested instructions ?

3. Are the damages excessive ?

Negligence of Hamann.

As to the first question of Hamann’s causal negligence the standard of review invoked by this court is familiarly stated:

“The rule is well established that a verdict or a finding of a jury will not be set aside or disturbed, ‘if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bleyer v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lee v. National League Baseball Club of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Bash v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Burant v. OrtloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API