Legal Opinion

Weigand v. Furniss

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1962No. 9206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Appellants have appealed from a summary judgment of dismissal of their cause of action directed against respondent, whereby appellants sought recovery of $6,-609.01 obtained from appellants by respondent, allegedly by reason of his false and fraudulent representations knowingly made.

Appellants by their amended complaint allege that respondent contracted to build a home for appellants at an agreed sum; respondent to bill intermittently, with invoices furnished for work completed, and receive payment therefor. Appellants allege misrepresentations occurred on two separate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Anderson v. Smith Frozen Foods of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United American Bank v. Parker (In Re Parker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
  2. Stevens v. Liberty Loan Corporation of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Budget Finance Plan v. HanerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Pioneer National Title Insurance v. Swartz (In Re Swartz)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  5. Pocatello Simplot Credit Union v. Permann (In Re Permann)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API