Legal Opinion

Budget Finance Plan v. Haner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1968No. 9937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff-respondent on a promissory note in the sum of $559.20 together with accrued interest at 6% and court costs.

Respondent, Budget Finance Plan, brought this action to recover the face value of a promissory note signed by appellants on October 30, 1964. On the basis of a financial statement prepared during this transaction, a loan of $70.00 was executed in favor of the appellants together with the renewal of a previously existing note in the amount of $489.20. At the time of this action, no payment had been made on the new note.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. AltenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Beneficial Finance Co. of Charleston v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. First Credit Corp. v. WellnitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Coeur D'Alenes Lead Co. v. KingsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Federal Finance Co. v. MerkelWashington Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Household Finance Corp. v. DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Superior Loan Corporation of Buffalo v. RobieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API