Legal Opinion

Habovick v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, 298PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This case arises under The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 566, 77 P.S. 1201 et seq. We are here concerned with an appeal by the employer from a judgment for the claimant entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County in accordance with an award 1 made by the Referee and affirmed by the Board.

On October 25, 1961, Andrew D. Haboviek filed a claim petition alleging that he was totally disabled as the result of employment by the Curtiss-Wright Corporation in a hazardous occupation, and that the cause of his disability was an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Wolfingbarger v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Porter v. Sterling Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Doheny v. CITY STORESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Merck & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Williams v. Spaulding Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Spaulding Bakeries, Inc. v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Nevison v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API