Legal Opinion

Williams v. Spaulding Bakeries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1975No. 221PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

On May 9, 1969, Charles R. Williams filed a claim petition under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, 1 alleging he was totally disabled as the result of employment by Spaulding Bakeries, Inc. [Spaulding], in a hazardous occupation. Williams had been employed by Spaulding from 1934 to April 21, 1969, interrupted only by two years of military service. During this time Williams served in many capacities, several of which involved exposure to flour dust. In his petition, Williams alleged that, as a result of his exposure to and inhalation of the flour…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Dunn v. Merck & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Perez v. Blumenthal Bros. Choc. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Brubaker v. Reading Eagle Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Greer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Borovich v. Colt IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bakery v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Boniecke v. McGraw-Edison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API