Raisch v. Cook
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered on a verdict for defendant. As a review of all the evidence favorable to them compels the conclusion that no other verdict could properly be sustained, there is no necessity for directly considering the several assignments of error.
Plaintiffs, who are real estate brokers, undertook to sell for defendant, who was then in California, a property located near their office in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. They submitted to him a proposition for its purchase, alleged to have been made to them by one Carr, who was a straw…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rice v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1890
- Wilkinson v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Cannell v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
- Sarshik v. FinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Pratt v. Patterson's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hershey v. Keyes CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Perry v. SpellmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Eisele v. Holloway (In Re Eisele)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- McHenry v. WeldingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.