Legal Opinion

Sarshik v. Fink

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1927No. Appeal, 320PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Plaintiff, a broker, was engaged as agent to sell real estate owned by defendant and others. Early in October, defendant offered, through a “blind advertisement” in a newspaper, a property for sale. Plaintiff, by letter of October 5th, asked him for full particulars regarding the property, stating, “I represent a client who is very much interested.” At an interview between the parties on October 9th, defendant placed the property with him for sale, agreeing to pay 2%% commission. The price was fixed at $250,000, but defendant indicated that an offer around…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  3. Finch v. Conrade'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. McMahen v. McMahenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. FlaniganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Warner Co. v. MacMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Onorato v. Wissahickon Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API