Sarshik v. Fink
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Plaintiff, a broker, was engaged as agent to sell real estate owned by defendant and others. Early in October, defendant offered, through a “blind advertisement” in a newspaper, a property for sale. Plaintiff, by letter of October 5th, asked him for full particulars regarding the property, stating, “I represent a client who is very much interested.” At an interview between the parties on October 9th, defendant placed the property with him for sale, agreeing to pay 2%% commission. The price was fixed at $250,000, but defendant indicated that an offer around…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Finch v. Conrade'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- McMahen v. McMahenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. FlaniganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Warner Co. v. MacMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Onorato v. Wissahickon Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.