Legal Opinion

Perry v. Spellman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1961No. Appeal, 354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Eevin, J.,

The plaintiff, William E. Perry, a real estate broker,. brought suit in assumpsit for a broker’s commission by virtue of an oral agreement made with the defendant, Charles Spellman. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2,364.00. The court below entered judgment n.o.v. for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed.

' The plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every fact and inference of fact which may be reasonably deduced from the evidence: Jemison v. Pfeifer, 397 Pa. 81, 152 A. 2d 697. Viewed in this light the facts are as follows: The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jemison v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Burke v. Daughters of the Most Holy Redeemer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. S. V. Thompson Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. McDonald v. KimmellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Tice v. EasterdaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simon v. H. K. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Binswanger v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. White Realty & Insurance Agency Co. v. MorelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. J.J. Gumberg Co., a Corporation v. Walworth Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  5. Wachter v. LimaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API