Legal Opinion
Earl Brace & Sons v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-140 ERIEPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
The instant matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by the Defendant, Ciba-Geigy Corporation (“Ciba”).
In May, 1987 the plaintiff, Earl Brace & Sons (“Brace”), purchased the defendant’s herbicide Dual 8E to control the growth of grasses on Brace’s potato farm. Between May 24 and May 28,1987, Brace planted 55 acres of potatoes. At the beginning of June, 1987, Brace sprayed a combination of Dual 8E and Lexone on the potato patch. Brace contends that while the Lexone…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Fmc Finance Corporation v. Albert D. Murphree, Jr. And Dorothy E. MurphreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hornberger v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Adams v. American Cyanamid Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
- Husky Spray Service, Inc. v. PatzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Lwt, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Yildiz G. Childers, and Childers Manufacturing Company, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.