Legal Opinion
Husky Spray Service, Inc. v. Patzer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1991No. 17222, 17243PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Robert Patzer, Monroe Chase, Midwest Air Center, Inc., and Lawrence F. Schmit (collectively referred to as defendants) appeal from a decision of the trial court awarding damages for breach of express warranty and prejudgment interest to Husky Spray Service, Inc. and its owner Dayle Luedeke (collectively referred to as Luedeke). Luedeke has filed a notice of review, challenging the trial court’s rejection of his claim based on breach of implied warranty. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
This case involves a dispute over a 1966 Callair airplane purchased by…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Metcalf v. Security International Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Chipperfield v. WoessnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Rogen v. MonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Pieper v. PieperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.