Legal Opinion

Eggert v. Smith Pratt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wright District Court.— HoN. W. D. EvaNS, J ndge. ActioN in equity to enforce specific performance of contract to sell real estate. Decree for plaintiff as to an undivided one-third of the land, .and assessing damages against the defendant Helen E. Smith Pratt in the sum of one dollar. The plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— ■ Helen E. Smith Pratt, being the owner of the undivided one-third of the land in question, and guardian of her minor daughter, who owned the other undivided two-thirds, entered into a written contract to convey the entire property to the plaintiff. In entering into the contract, plaintiff knew the condition of the title, and knew that a conveyance of the daughter’s interest could be had only by authority to be obtained from the court. Proceedings were afterward begun to obtain the necessary authority to make a conveyance, but were dismissed. It appears from *728the evidence, that about the-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Margraf v. . MuirNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Foley v. McKeeganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Townsend v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Donner v. RedenbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Conner v. BaxterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kowalke v. EvernhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Clark v. BeltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Greer v. DoriotSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. Thomas v. PalmerNevada Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sietsema v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API