Thomas v. Palmer
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
If agreement of June 21, 1922, required deed from defendant within one year, plaintiff waived strict compliance and action is prematurely brought. Evidence shows plaintiff offered to perform act essential to obtaining patent, and conveyance to him by defendant of patent title, and fully understood situation. Waiver does not necessarily imply one has been misled to his prejudice or into altered position; estoppel always involves this element. 40 Cyc. 257, n. 78. Waiver may be created by acts, conduct, or declarations insufficient to create technical estoppel. Idem, n. 82. Giving of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hopkins v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- County of Clark v. Bonanza No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Cole v. AtkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Judd v. BallNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936