Legal Opinion

Reader v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

This is defendant’s consolidated appeal from convictions in two Superior Court trials, the first for conspiracy and delivery of marijuana, and the second for burglary in the third degree, three felony theft charges, and possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony.

We find no merit in defendant’s arguments that the evidence was insufficient to convict for conspiracy, and that the Court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal or a new trial as to the first trial because of new evidence discovered during the second trial. Thus we will consider…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  2. State v. SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. State v. NorrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. State v. ShahanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. State v. CarrNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Wilburn Rollo Mansfield v. Ron ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. State v. StoopsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API