Legal Opinion

People v. Antone

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1956No. Crim. 5392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The property involved in this case consists of a sound amplifier, an adding machine and a typewriter, which had been stolen by one Eastin, a high school student 18 years of age. On the night the amplifier was stolen, Eastin met defendant Antone in the home of one Trillo. In a conversation among them, Eastin stated where he obtained the amplifier, and attempted without success to sell it to Antone. At a later date, Eastin and Antone had a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MacEwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. RavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. CoakleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PolsalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API