Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1970No. Crim. 5050PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
Defendants Smith, Mitchell, and Easter appeal from judgments after a jury found them guilty of first degree robbery. A fourth defendant, Zollicoffer, was convicted at the same trial but has not appealed. At the trial each defendant was represented by separate counsel. On appeal a court-appointed attorney filed an opening brief on behalf of all three appellants. After the respondent’s brief was filed, this court appointed another attorney to represent Smith, on behalf of whom briefs were filed. Although the parties’ briefs do not raise the same contentions, we…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. ChojnackyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.