Legal Opinion
Giancarlo Incalza v. Fendi North America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2007No. 04-57119PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether, in this case, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) preempts California labor laws that forbid employers from firing an employee without good cause. We also consider whether the district court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. In both instances, our answer is No.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In June of 1990, Giancarlo Incalza, a native and citizen of Italy with two years of business education, began working as a sales associate for Fendi in Rome. Approximately six months after his employment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Aramark Facility Services v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1877Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Gilberto Santillan v. USA Waste of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.